Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 ra Rehabilitation Act of 1973
LLOYD v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2022cv05148
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LLOYD
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SARA GRAY and BENNETT BRICKLIN AND SALTZBURG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. HARRISON et al
as 2:2021cv05120
Plaintiff:
NASHAE NAEISHA SMITH
Defendant:
BENNETTE HARRISON, ANDRE MARTINO, CYNTHIA L. EVERETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIDDINGS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.
as 2:2021cv04206
Plaintiff:
JACOB GIDDINGS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICER TYREE BENNETT and OFFICER TYREE BURNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hale et al v. Leiss et al
as 1:2021cv01028
Plaintiff:
Penny Lee Valentine-Hale and Thomas Matthew Hale
Defendant:
Derry Township Police Department, Robert E. Bennett, Sean J. Sargen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. NORTH PENN SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2020cv05841
Defendant:
NORTH PENN SCHOOL DISTRICT, JULIANE D. RAMIC, CATHERINE A. WESLEY and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY B. BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
