Cases 21 - 30 of 871
Barry Lamon v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 20-16284
Defendant / Appellee:
J. AMAYA, O. LUNA, P. RIVERA-SIERRA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRY LOUIS LAMON
Haydar Khafaji v. Patrick Covello, et al
as 20-55449
Defendant / Appellee:
M. VOONG, CHIEF, within the office of appeal, BRIAN ROBERTS, Parole Board Commissioner, PATRICK COVELLO, Warden of R.J.D. State Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAYDAR AL KHAFAJI, AKA Hydar Al Khafati
Alex Garcia v. Martin Biter
as 20-55213
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALEX ALEJANDRO F. GARCIA
Respondent / Appellee:
MARTIN BITER, Warden
Riley et al v. Clark et al
as 4:2020cv00325
Defendant:
Chris Haines, Greg Mendenhall, UPMC Pinnacle and others
Plaintiff:
Carmen Riley and Thomas Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph George v. USA, et al
as 19-56528
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON CONGE, Deputy, JOHN DOE, Owner Mission Valley Orn and Marillo Facial Surgery, MARVIN MALECHA, President New School of Architecture and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH GEORGE
Edward Ray, Jr. v. A. Oliva, et al
as 19-17431
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN D. BITER, Chief Deputy Warden, G. GARCIA, Accounting Officer Specialist, S. FIGUEROA, Office Technician Accounting Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Gerry Williams v. Martin Biter, et al
as 19-17186
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERRY WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
A. MANASRAH and MARTIN BITER, Warden
Al Khafati v. Covello et al
as 3:2019cv01811
Defendant:
M. Voong, Does 1 to 5, Inclusive, Patrick Covello and others
Plaintiff:
Haydar Al Khafati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Rodriguez v. Cate et al
as 2:2019cv01797
Defendant:
M. D. Biter and Matthew Cate
Plaintiff:
Erick Eddie Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Barron v. M. Biter
as 19-56007
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE FRANK BARRON
Respondent / Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
