Cases 1 - 10 of 427
Urve MaggittiIn re: Urve Maggitti
as 24-1660
Petitioner:
In re: URVE MAGGITTI
Respondent:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
FOMB, et al v. Pabon Bosques, et al
as 24-1300
Plaintiff:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO
Appellant:
LUIS F. PABON BOSQUES, RAUL MARTINEZ PEREZ, ELVIN A. ROSADO MORALES and others
Defendant:
PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico, PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY, LUIS M. COLLAZO RODRIGUEZ, in his official capacities as Administrator of the Retirement System for Employees of the Government of Puerto Rico and Executive Director of the Government of Puerto Rico Retirement Board and others
Interested Party:
FRANCISCO J. TOLEDO MENDEZ
Gonzalez v. United States Human Rights Network, et al.
as 24-801
Plaintiff:
ROSALEE GONZALEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES HUMAN RIGHTS NETWORK, MARCIA JOHNSON-BLANCO, ERIC TARS and others
Gonzalez v. United States Human Rights Network, et al.
as 24-762
Plaintiff:
ROSALEE GONZALEZ, Dr.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES HUMAN RIGHTS NETWORK, MARCIA JOHNSON-BLANCO, ERIC TARS and others
Rodriguez-Blanco v. Garland
as 24-719
Petitioner:
TEODORO RODRIGUEZ-BLANCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Blanco-Rivera v. Garland
as 24-657
Petitioner:
MARTINIANO BLANCO-RIVERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Blanco-Guerrero v. Garland
as 24-22
Petitioner:
JUAN ALBERTO BLANCO-GUERRERO and ANNIA MARGARITA BLANCO-RODAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Blanco-Hernandez v. Garland
as 23-4337
Petitioner:
JORGE MARIO BLANCO-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Tipsy Aliens LLC et al
as 7:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Tipsy Aliens LLC d/b/a The Alibi and d/b/a Alibi on 17th and Andrea Blanco-Bolio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
