Cases 1 - 10 of 2,909
KAKHABRISHVILI v. U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION
as 1:2024cv01748
Plaintiff:
ZURAB KAKHABRISHVILI
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv01702
Plaintiff:
LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER and REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND LEGAL SERVICES
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Flores v. Garland, et al.
as 24-3656
Plaintiff:
JENNY LISETTE FLORES
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
State of Louisiana v. Garland
as 24-30359
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Missouri, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Mary Cheng, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Hankins v. The US Custom and Border Protection et al
as 7:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr.
Defendant:
The US Custom and Border Protection and The US Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Flairwood Cabinetry
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Flairwood Cabinetry
Defendant:
United States, United States Trade Representative, U.S. Trade Rep. Katherine C. Tai and others
CATO INSTITUTE v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION et al
as 1:2024cv01642
Plaintiff:
CATO INSTITUTE
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Koklich, et al. v. Borders, et al.
as 24-3505
Plaintiff:
BRUCE KOKLICH, individually and as Class Representatives, HAROLD W. TAYLOR, DAVID M. ZIEMKE and others
Defendant:
DEAN BORDERS, Warden and Senior Administrative and Policy making Officer, individual and official capacity and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, a California Public Entity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
