Cases 21 - 30 of 193
BOYLES v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HAROLD BOYLES, JR. and WILLIAM HAROLD BOYLES, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
BOYLES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
DANILO PABLO BOYLES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burriss et al v. U. S. Supreme Court et al
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Michael Burriss, Raymond Edwards, Melvin Brinson and others
Defendant:
U. S. Supreme Court, U.S. Grand Jury, U.S. Justice Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18575
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BOYLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOYLES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14610
Plaintiff:
PADRIC BOYLES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOYLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12816
Plaintiff:
TOMMY BOYLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boyles v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 1:2023cv02255
Plaintiff:
Christina Boyles
Defendant:
The Kroger Co., ABC Corporations 1-3 and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Boyles v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 1:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
Christina Boyles
Defendant:
The Kroger Co., ABC Corporations 1-3 and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Timothy Boyle v. Warden, Holman CF, et al
as 23-11073
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY SCOTT BOYLE
Respondent / Appellee:
HOLMAN CF WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
USA v. Lafayette Demetrius Boyle
as 23-11373
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LAFAYETTE DEMETRIUS BOYLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
