Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Boyle et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
David Boyle and Jennifer Boyle
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boyles v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03270
Plaintiff:
Donna Boyles
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bridges v. Blackmon et al
as 1:2023cv01481
Plaintiff:
Andrey L. Bridges
Defendant:
Patricia A. Blackmon, Mary J. Boyle, Frank D. Celebrezze, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Boyle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Michael Timothy Boyle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shampine v. Bell et al
as 1:2022cv01753
Plaintiff:
Latefah Shampine
Defendant:
Jeffrey Keith Bell, Penny Cousper Dainel, Magistrate Richard Gedeon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Boyles v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03204
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robin Boyles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wiertella v. Lake County, Ohio et al
as 1:2020cv02739
Defendant:
Lt. Michelle Prather, Unknown Correctional Officers 1-15, Sgt. Matthew Darone and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wiertella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyle et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06047
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Boyle and Gary S. Boyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyle v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv05933
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Sharon Boyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
