Cases 31 - 40 of 884
Bifield v. Kimberly et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eugene Bifield
Defendant:
Melissa Kimberly, Victor Moreno, C. Baird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alanis v. Neely et al
as 7:2023cv00723
Petitioner:
Maria Isabel Alanis
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pierson v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Bernard Pierson
Defendant:
J. Jones, C. Welch, T. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Calloway et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Rashad C. Lee
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foreman v. Neely et al
as 7:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Renata Foreman
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely, D Mosby, C Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Johnson, Moreno, Heckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Parker et al (INMATE 2)
as 4:2022cv01539
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Anderson
Defendant:
O. Parker, D. Dent, C. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Parker et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Anderson
Defendant:
O. Parker, D. Dent, C. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
