Cases 1 - 10 of 1,940
Weeks v. Arkansas Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections, Thomas W Hurst, Brandon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Wells et al
as 4:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
C Wells and C Branham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chenault v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
James C Chenault
Defendant:
S Williams and Pritcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Marshal Reed, Aundrea Culclager, Joe Page, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Granado v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Joe Granado
Defendant:
C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Swift v. Dunagan et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J Swift
Defendant:
Heath Dunagan, Clint Baker, John C Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Omega Center
as 6:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nard v. Does
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antoine C Nard
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. Cross County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ellis Sparks
Defendant:
Cross County Jail, Arleen Clements and Does Cam, C. O., Cross County Jail; and Matt, C. O. Cross County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Double Tree Parking Garage et al
as 4:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
