Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Beatrice Velasco et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv01208
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Velasco , Georgia Lou Payne , Rodney Penland and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP , AstraZeneca PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Conner v. SimplexGrinnell, LP
as 2:2012cv00630
Plaintiff:
Barrett L Conner
Defendant:
SimplexGrinnell LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conner v. United States
as 3:2011cv05678
Plaintiff:
Donna M Conner
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Mahoney v. Hammond et al
as 2:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
Steve Alan Mahoney
Defendant:
Steve Hammond, Devon Sohrum, Maggie Miller Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taha et al v. O'Donnell et al
as 2:2009cv00003
Plaintiff:
Shani Taha and Kwami Taha
Defendant:
Daniel O'Donnell , Marilyn Johnson and Town of La Conner, Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Robinson v. Conner et al
as 2:2010cv00224
Plaintiff:
Michael Robinson
Defendant:
William Conner, Chad Conner, Jane Doe Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Safeco Insurance Company of America et al v. Sunbeam Products Inc et al
as 3:2008cv05759
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of America, Donald Conner and Terry Conner
Defendant:
Sunbeam Products Inc and The Holmes Group Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Conner et al v. City of Seattle
as 2:2008cv00913
Plaintiff:
William Conner and Marilyn Conner
Defendant:
City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Summers v. Polizzi et al
as 3:2008cv05346
Plaintiff:
Shannon Summers
Defendant:
Frank A. Polizzi, Rolf Schumann, Conner Daily and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
