Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Jaafar v. Loudoun County et al
as 1:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Tarik Jaafar
Defendant:
Loudoun County, David Wozniak, Carl Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Conner v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Tanzenia Medana Conner
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Conner v. Xfinity et al
as 1:2023cv01222
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Conner
Defendant:
Xfinity, Assurance Wireless USA-LP, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
SOC LLC et al v. Conner II et al
as 1:2022cv01280
Plaintiff:
SOC LLC and Day & Zimmermann Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Billy Max Conner II and David Ray Johnson
Garces et al v. Gerber Products Co.
as 1:2021cv00902
Plaintiff:
Aileen Garces, Edelin Altuve, Jenny Anderson and others
Defendant:
Gerber Products Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conner v Piedmont Regional Jail
as 1:2021cv00464
Petitioner:
Johnnie Lee Conner
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv00366
Defendant:
James E. Parks, Nikita B. Murphy, K. Breeding and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald T. Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00855
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Conner v. RARE Hospitality International, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00689
Defendant:
Jay McCormack and RARE Hospitality International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sonya Lynn Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prasad v. Chesterfield Police Dept. et al
as 3:2018cv00307
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
Chesterfield Police Dept., Asina Usubaleiva, Bradford Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
