Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Calderon v. Duszynski et al
as 3:2021cv00233
Defendant:
Glenn Handzlik and JEFFREY DUSZYNSKI
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO CALDERON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calderon v. Warden
as 3:2019cv00737
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Oscar Ernesto Calderon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CMB ENTERTAINMENT, LLC et al v. CALDERON et al
as 1:2019cv02703
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ABRAMS and CMB ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Defendant:
PYRAMID ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC. and MARK CALDERON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
CALDERON v. ABRAMS
as 1:2019cv02681
Defendant:
BRYAN ABRAMS
Plaintiff:
MARK CALDERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
as 1:2016cv00920
Relator:
MICHELLE CALDERON
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
CALDERON-ACEVEDO v. QUINTANA et al
as 1:2016cv01422
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO CALDERON-ACEVEDO
Respondent:
FRANCISCO QUINTANA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THORNTON v. CMB ENTERTAINMENT, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00320
Defendant:
BRYAN ABRAMS, MARK CALDERON and CMB ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Plaintiff:
KEVIN THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
CALDERON v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv01748
Plaintiff:
BARBARA CALDERON
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CALDERON v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
as 1:2014cv00976
Plaintiff:
ELISEO CALDERON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
