Cases 1 - 10 of 18
McGill et al v. Xponential Fitness LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03909
Plaintiff:
Shannon McGill, Gina Oliveira, Justin Curry and others
Defendant:
Xponential Fitness LLC, XPOF Assetco, LLC, AKT Franchise, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Baldwin v. Coffee County Government
as 4:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Carey Baldwin
Defendant:
Coffee County Government and Coffee County, TN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Harlan v. Beer (PLR1)
as 4:2020cv00023
Plaintiff:
Kaleb Harlan
Defendant:
Carey Beer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Carey et al v. Physician Technology Partners, LLC
as 3:2017cv00213
Plaintiff:
Linda Carey , Elizabeth Okakpu and Bikramjit Mathaun
Defendant:
Physician Technology Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fitch v. Carey Counseling Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01066
Plaintiff:
Edward Fitch
Defendant:
Carey Counseling Center, Inc. and Robert Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adkerson v. Comprehensive Security, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00184
Plaintiff:
Carey Adkerson
Defendant:
Comprehensive Security, LLC and Loyd S. Poteete
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carey v. Uber Technologies Inc.
as 1:2016cv01058
Plaintiff:
Duane Carey
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stotler et al v. Selfridge Leasing, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv01491
Plaintiff:
Carey D Stotler , Christina L Ketchum and Michael W Barnhart
Defendant:
Selfridge Leasing, LLC , Providence Healthcare Management, Inc. and Eli Gunzburg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bradford v. Bolen et al
as 3:2014cv02184
Plaintiff:
Cody Bolen and Carey Bradford
Defendant:
LRI Holdings, Inc., Logan's Roadhouse, Inc. and Roadhouse Holding, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Browning v. Jiang
as 2:2014cv02107
Plaintiff:
Carey Browning
Defendant:
Yi Jiang
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
