Cases 31 - 40 of 583
CAREY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv16736
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CAREY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HALL et al v. FRANKLIN SPRING CREEK FORD LLC
as 1:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
CAREY HALL and JIMMY HALL JR
Defendant:
FRANKLIN SPRING CREEK FORD LLC
CAREY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12751
Plaintiff:
GARY CAREY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hoeft v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02149
Plaintiff:
Carey Hoeft
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Walker v. Bailey et al
as 3:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Antwan Walker
Defendant:
Sean Bailey, Carey L. Randall, James R. Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
CAREY v. WASSERMAN et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY OLEN CAREY
Defendant:
JUDGE HARVEY WASSERMAN, BENNIE HARPER and HART COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saito et al v. Lewis et al
as 2:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Koichi Saito and Lynnea Saito
Defendant:
Corey Lewis, Pratik Patel, Molly Emma Carey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Santiago v. Fisher et al
as 3:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Benito A. Santiago
Defendant:
Darius Fisher, Herman Goods, Carey Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Butler v. Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation, et al
as 23-11151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
GRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION, RASHAWN BUTLER, ROBERT WHITEHEAD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
