Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Cartwright v. MERCK & CO, INC et al
as 2:2020cv01528
Defendant:
MERCK & CO, INC and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Plaintiff:
Baby Cartwright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTWRIGHT v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv04052
Defendant:
NORMAN, WALKER, SPICER and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CARTWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTWRIGHT v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv03933
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and TRANS UNION RENTAL SCREENING SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CARTWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
CARTWRIGHT et al v. MGK INDUSTRIES
as 5:2018cv02733
Plaintiff:
PATRICK CARTWRIGHT and PAUL CARTWRIGHT
Defendant:
MGK INDUSTRIES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
CARTWRIGHT v. THE CBE GROUP, INC.
as 2:2016cv01181
Plaintiff:
ERIN E. CARTWRIGHT
Defendant:
THE CBE GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
NIEMOCZYNSKI et al v. UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2016cv00212
Plaintiff:
LEON NIEMOCZYNSKI, JR. and NALINA NIEMOCZYNSKI
Defendant:
UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP OF PENNSYLVANIA , UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD, ROBERT CARTWRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2015cv01698
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson, James C. Barnacle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESBANCO, INC v. CARTWRIGHT
as 2:2013cv00437
Plaintiff:
WESBANCO, INC
Defendant:
KAREN W. CARTWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CARTWRIGHT v. ZIMMER, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05981
Plaintiff:
ANTONIA C. CARTWRIGHT
Defendant:
ZIMMER, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and ZIMMER ORTHOPAEDIC SURGICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARTWRIGHT v. FIDELITY BANK et al
as 2:2012cv01502
Plaintiff:
KAREN W. CARTWRIGHT
Defendant:
FIDELITY BANK , RICHARD SPENCER and ANTHONY ROCCO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
