Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Andersen v. Carver County Sheriffs Office et al
as 0:2022cv03137
Plaintiff:
Travis Clay Andersen
Defendant:
Carver County Sheriff's Office, Laura Lynn Zimmerman and Carver County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Zongo v. Carver County et al
as 0:2021cv01521
Defendant:
Carver County, Unknown number of unknown named Correctional Officers, James Olson and others
Plaintiff:
Wendkouni Wilfried Arnold Zongo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carver v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv00478
Defendant:
Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Carver, Jr.
Schaefer v. Hennessy et al
as 0:2020cv02458
Defendant:
Jason Kamerud, Carver County, Peter Anderley and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Schaefer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv01118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv02414
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carver County, Minnesota v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 0:2019cv02388
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Carver County, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Schroeder et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02086
Plaintiff:
Brent Borck, Hughie Boggs, Marcus Alexander and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02069
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Deniger, Rusty Brown, Dustin Sizemoy and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
