Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Romo et al v. East Chicago Indiana et al
as 2:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Teresa Romo, Jose Romo-Caballero and Jose Romo Caballero
Defendant:
East Chicago Indiana, Charles Hicks and John Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WAGGONER et al v. HOOD et al
as 1:2022cv01676
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN WAGGONER and KYLIE WAGGONER
Defendant:
RYAN HOOD, MARITZA MIEHL, Castillo Packaging, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Castillo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Allie S. Castillo
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CASTILLO v. TUTT et al
as 1:2020cv01003
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL R CASTILLO and MIGUEL CASTILLO
Defendant:
ELAM and J TUTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
