Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Chatman v. WellPath et al
as 2:2024cv02014
Plaintiff:
Darrington R. Chatman
Defendant:
WellPath, Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Wilson/Massigale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman, Sr. v. State of Indiana, The et al
as 3:2023cv00968
Petitioner:
Albert D.M. Chatman, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Indiana, The, (f/n/u) Reddman, (f/n/u) Olmstead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chatman v. Aaron Thomas Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02024
Plaintiff:
Larry Chatman
Defendant:
Aaron Thomas Company, Inc. and JOHN DOE
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Diverse Enterprise, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Diverse Enterprise, Inc. doing business as Everything Bar and Lounge and Eric Chatman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chatman et al v. Robertson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00532
Plaintiff:
Patrick Chatman, A.K.C. and Lakeesha Lavon Chatman
Defendant:
Robertson County, Tennessee and Deputy Heather Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Memphis Police Department
as 2:2019cv02472
Plaintiff:
Darrington Rashun Chatman
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv01246
Plaintiff:
Lela Chatman
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Beard v. Smith et al
as 2:2016cv02262
Plaintiff:
James H. Beard, Jr.
Defendant:
LoAmma Smith, Helen Johnson, Ozata Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
