Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Taite v. Clarke County Alabama District Attorneys Prosecutors et al
as 1:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Marcus O. Taite
Defendant:
Clarke County Alabama District Attorneys Prosecutors, Insurance Providers, Officials State Bonds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Rice v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv01382
Plaintiff:
Brian K Rice
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Kenneth Boswell, Ray L Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Beyond Gravity Inc
as 5:2023cv00925
Defendant:
Beyond Gravity Inc and Ruag Space USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stewart v. Turner et al
as 5:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Tesheal Stewart
Defendant:
Sheriff Kevin Turner, Robert L Broussard and Joshua M Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clark v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 5:2022cv01258
Plaintiff:
Christopher Clark
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Reed v. Strickland et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Terry M. Reed
Defendant:
Denny L. Strickland, II, Denny L. Strickland, III, Estate of Michael Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
