Cases 11 - 20 of 580
Parker v. Michigan, State of et al
as 5:2024cv10079
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parker
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Matthew Baranski, John Doe and others
Tinsley #360973 v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Choya Tinsley #360973
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Chris King, B. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2023cv01339
Plaintiff:
Jerry A. Clark
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Clark #222915 v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
C. Wilson, R. Niemi, T. Perttu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad #242898 v. King et al
as 1:2023cv01306
Plaintiff:
El Amin Muhammad #242898
Defendant:
Chris King, J. Winger, Maxwell Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker, Jr. #132771 v. Kinsella et al
as 2:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
L.T. Tucker, Jr. #132771 and Kitwana Omari Mbwana
Defendant:
Unknown Kinsella, Unknown Haase, Unknown Picotte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01024
Plaintiff:
Mr Donald Roy Clark and Donald Roy Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap)
Clark v. Pro Sports Extra, LLC
as 2:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clark
Defendant:
Pro Sports Extra, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Berryman et al v. Artis et al
as 2:2023cv12339
Plaintiff:
Philip Wayne Berryman and Donmisce Clark
Defendant:
F. Artis, A. Little, T. Wysong and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
