Cases 21 - 30 of 281
IN RE JEFFREY B. CLARK
as 1:2023mc00007
Plaintiff:
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
Respondent:
JEFFREY B. CLARK and D.C. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
CLARKE v. CARROLSBURG SQUARE CONDOMINIUM et al
as 1:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
JAMES CLARKE
Defendant:
CARROLSBURG SQUARE CONDOMINIUM and SHAUNA STALLWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
IN RE JEFFREY B. CLARK
as 1:2022mc00117
Respondent:
JEFFREY B. CLARK
Interested Party:
HAMILTON P. FOX, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv03158
Petitioner:
Mr. HAMILTON P. FOX, III
Respondent:
Mr. Jeffrey B Clark
IN RE: JEFFREY B. CLARK
as 1:2022mc00096
In Re:
JEFFREY B. CLARK
Interested Party:
D.C. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY and HAMILTON P. FOX, III
HASHI v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv03142
Plaintiff:
ISAAC HASHI
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, JEFFREY CLARK, MARK MEADOWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TACCINO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv03115
Plaintiff:
VRINDER SINGH RANDHAWA, WILLIAM A. TACCINO and CAROL J. TACCINO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv02874
Plaintiff:
JAMES HEDMAN CLARK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GINA RAIMONDO, KATHIE VIDAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
