Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Pinney v. Police of la Salle, IL et al
as 1:2023cv12414
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Pinney and Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
Police of la Salle, IL, Housing Authority of la Salle County IL, Court of la Salle County, IL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Macdonald v. Massachusetts State Police et al
as 1:2022cv12235
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Chief Massachusetts State Police, State Police Officer Clark, State Police Officer John Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2022cv10999
Petitioner:
Clarke Phillips
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Delacruz v. Turco et al
as 1:2019cv10456
Defendant:
Donna M. Sweeney, Michael Sedgwick, Cynthia Briggs and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Delacruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Spaulding
as 1:2018cv12250
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Petitioner:
Kerry Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. Federal Bureau of Prisions et al
as 1:2016cv12491
Plaintiff:
Marjory F. Clark
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisions and Medical Center, Devens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry v. Clark
as 1:2016cv11471
Petitioner:
Timothy Joseph Barry
Respondent:
Harold Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Babcock v. Carlotto et al
as 1:2016cv10951
Plaintiff:
Ryan P. Babcock
Defendant:
Adam J. Carlotto, Fairview Hospital, John J. Dubois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wall v. Lubelczyk et al
as 1:2015cv12993
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wall
Defendant:
Rebecca Lubelczyk, Thomas Groblewski, Adrianna Carrillo, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
