Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Ahmed v. Monroe et al
as 0:2024cv03481
Defendant:
Clay County States Attorney Office and Shanon Monroe
Plaintiff:
Abdiaziz M. Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Xanadu Media LLC v. Edge Data Solutions et al
as 0:2024cv03282
Defendant:
Clay Seibert, Delray Wannemacher, Edge Data Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Xanadu Media LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Andersen v. MN Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2023cv02627
Plaintiff:
Travis Clay Andersen
Defendant:
MN Department of Corrections, Lieutenant Nicholas Witter, Sergeant Patrick J. Barnum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andersen v. Wilton
as 0:2023cv02549
Plaintiff:
Travis Clay Andersen
Defendant:
Christian S. Wilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alicea et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02482
Plaintiff:
Israel Alicea, Leroy Ahnee, Richard Cabbil and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Wilson et al v. Minnesota, State of et al
as 0:2023cv02197
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Jacob Wilson and M. J. W.
Defendant:
Minnesota, State of, Judge Michelle Lawson, Clay, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clay v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01673
Plaintiff:
Irene Clay
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cheng v. Wilcox et al
as 0:2023cv00737
Defendant:
Clayton Wilcox, Nguyen Lee, Howard Bonifant and others
Plaintiff:
Sheng-Wen Cheng
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Norris et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Norris, John Rumple, Quashawn Cypress and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Andersen v. Carver County Sheriffs Office et al
as 0:2022cv03137
Plaintiff:
Travis Clay Andersen
Defendant:
Carver County Sheriff's Office, Laura Lynn Zimmerman and Carver County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
