Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Fisher v. Conner
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Defendant:
Robert F Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Conner v. Illinois State Department of Children and Family Services Madison County
as 4:2023cv01464
Petitioner:
Andrea Conner
Respondent:
Illinois State Department of Children and Family Services Madison County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Conners v. Environmental Operations, Inc.
as 4:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Gregory Conners
Defendant:
Environmental Operations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Conner v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 4:2022cv00818
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Conner
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Conner v. Dolgencorp, L.L.C.
as 4:2022cv01168
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Conner
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, L.L.C. doing business as Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Conner v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv01108
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Conner
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Eastern Reception Diagnostic Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. City of Lee's Summit, Missouri et al
as 4:2021cv00546
Plaintiff:
Cymone A Turner
Defendant:
City of Lee's Summit, Missouri, James M. Tobin, Travis Forbes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Conner v. Scaglione et al
as 4:2021cv00385
Defendant:
Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company and Steven Scaglione
Plaintiff:
Sominkcole Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conner v. USA
as 4:2020cv00732
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kevin L Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
