Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Cramer (PS) v. State of CO Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv01310
Plaintiff: Chelsea C. Cramer
Defendant: State of CO Department of Human Services, Weld Department of Human Services and Office of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Cramer
as 24-6057
Petitioner: PETER EUGENE CRAMER
Respondent: CARRIE BRIDGES
Coker v. Stitt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00147
Plaintiff: David Wayne Coker
Defendant: Kevin Stitt, Kameron Harvanek, Matthew Sinnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cramer v. Bridges We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner: Peter Eugene Cramer
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cramer v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00017
Petitioner: Peter Eugene Cramer
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cramer (PS) v. Weld Department of Human Services
as 1:2023cv02066
Plaintiff: Chelsea C. Cramer
Defendant: Weld Department of Human Services, Office of Appeals and Hearing Division DHS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02007
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Johnson v. Reynolds, et al
as 23-1161
Plaintiff / Appellant: JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: TERESA REYNOLDS, NATALIYA NICKELS, POWELL and others
Johnson v. Cramer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02057
Plaintiff: William Arthur Johnson
Defendant: Daniel W. Cramer and Hazen Farm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ramirez v. Cramer
as 6:2021cv01298
Plaintiff: Jose Ramirez
Defendant: Daniel W. Cramer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?