Cases 31 - 40 of 587
MARTINEZ v. LENIHAN
as 2:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE LISA PUPO LENIHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTINEZ v. MCCORMICK
as 2:2023cv01408
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE RICHARD E. MCCORMICK, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CRUZ v. KIJAKAZI
as 5:2023cv02978
Plaintiff:
NICOLE M. CRUZ
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CRUZ v. MONTILLA
as 5:2023cv02726
Plaintiff:
ANGELICA M CRUZ
Defendant:
JUAN J MONTILLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
KENCH v. RUBIO et al
as 2:2023cv02628
Plaintiff:
NICOLE KENCH also known as NICOLE BANKS doing business as NEW KIND AGENCY and NICOLE BANKS
Defendant:
DAVID LOPEZ MARTINEZ doing business as LOPEZHOUSE and JOSE CARLOS CRUZ RUBIO doing business as LOPEZHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GOODE v. ZALESKI et al
as 2:2023cv02506
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
THOMAS M. ZALESKI, WILLIAM J. KNECHT, SHIVA RAJA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02439
Plaintiff:
Maria Cruz
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
CRUZ v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 5:2023cv02439
Plaintiff:
MARIA CRUZ
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. doing business as THE HOME DEPOT and THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
MARTINEZ v. CREANY
as 2:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JUDGE TIMOTHY CREANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
