Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Longwell v. Cholak et al
as 2:2022cv02754
Plaintiff:
Donald Longwell, III
Defendant:
George Cholak, Nurse Sue and Nurse DeAnne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Longwell v. Lucas et al
as 2:2022cv02673
Plaintiff:
Donald Longwell, III
Defendant:
Sheriff David Lucas, Sgt. Tom Uptagraph, Sgt. Dewey Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00030
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
THOMAS v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv03918
Plaintiff:
CARMEN DEANN THOMAS
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montney v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2020cv01835
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
DeAnn Montney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Holman et al
as 3:2019cv00227
Defendant:
Border Line Pub N Grub LLC, Deanne Holman and Ronald Holman
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Malec v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv01214
Plaintiff:
Deanne Malec
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bell v. City of Maple Heights et al
as 1:2017cv01226
Plaintiff:
Lawayne Bell
Defendant:
City of Maple Heights , Maple Heights Police Department , John C. Popielarczyk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lester v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01065
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lester
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections and DeAnn Osgood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Home Depot USA Inc, et al
as 2:2016cv00926
Plaintiff:
Deanne Reed
Defendant:
Premier Horticulture, Inc. , Home Depot USA Inc , The Home Depot and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
