Cases 1 - 10 of 15
LeFever v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 8:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Luke LeFever
Defendant:
Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Scott Frakes, Dr. Deol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fausto Garcia v. United States
as 22-2792
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fausto De Los Santos Garcia
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Fausto Garcia v. United States
as 22-2038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fausto De Los Santos Garcia
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Garcia v. USA
as 0:2021cv02372
Petitioner:
Fausto De Los Santos Garcia
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States v. Fausto De Los Santos Garcia
as 19-2848
Defendant / Appellant:
Fausto De Los Santos Garcia
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Anthony Floyd v. United States, et al
as 19-1274
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony James Floyd
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and Robert De Los Santos
Anthony Floyd v. United States, et al
as 19-1253
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony James Floyd
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and Robert De Los Santos, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service
Floyd v. United States of America et al
as 4:2018mc00612
Respondent:
United States of America, Robert De Los Santos and Internal Revenue Service
Petitioner:
Anthony James Floyd
Floyd v. United States of America et al
as 4:2018mc09018
Respondent:
United States of America, Robert De Los Santos and Internal Revenue Service
Petitioner:
Anthony James Floyd
Interested Party:
UMB Bank, N.A.
Reeves et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 4:2017cv01436
Plaintiff:
Karen Reeves , Retha Clememts , Shereel Connolly and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
