Cases 11 - 20 of 1,292
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant:
Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Butler v. Waters et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Robey Lee Butler
Defendant:
Kyle E. Waters, Matthew Orendorff and Stacey Slaughter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caloto v. Paycom Software, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Chris H. Caloto
Defendant:
Paycom Software Inc, Chad Richison and Craig E. Boelte
Petitioner:
Calvin E Mein
Minarik et al v. Paycom Software Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Joseph Minarik
Defendant:
Paycom Software Inc, Chad Richison and Craig Boelte
Petitioner:
Calvin E Mein
Terrapin v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Ruth E Terrapin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Schoenrock v. Paycom Software Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Corey Schoenrock
Defendant:
Paycom Software Inc, Chad Richison and Craig Boelte
Petitioner:
Calvin E Mein
Bointy et al v. Integris Health Inc
as 5:2023cv01206
Plaintiff:
Joseph E Bointy
Defendant:
Integris Health Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Richison v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Richison
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
