Cases 21 - 30 of 9,377
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00647
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Patterson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Eugene P Patterson
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, United States Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(PC) Overstreet v. Moseley
as 2:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Jeremie Ryan Overstreet
Defendant:
Howard E. Moseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Oliver
as 3:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Kennedy
Defendant:
Ronald E. Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC)Bronson v. Gallardo et al
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Duane E. Bronson
Defendant:
Gallardo and Clifton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
James E. Hill
Defendant:
Julie Williams and C. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merino v. Unknown Parties et al
as 4:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Luis E Merino, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Executive Departments Government, United States Intelligence Communities, Federal Agencies Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jacques v. Borrego, et al
as 3:2024cv01712
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jacques
Defendant:
R. Borrego and M. Brito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manago v. Cueva et al
as 3:2024cv00524
Petitioner:
Stewart Manago
Respondent:
Daniel E. Cueva and James Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald E. Booker v. M. Welch et al
as 2:2024cv02237
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Booker
Defendant:
Officer M. Welch, Officer Parra and Officer J. Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
