Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Rodriguez v. Ramirez et al
as 4:2019cv03002
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, BNSF Railway Company, Ollie R. Ramirez and others
Plaintiff:
Yankiel E. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2018cv00540
Plaintiff:
James E Johnson and James E. Johnson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Rand v. Stanosheck et al
as 8:2018cv00481
Plaintiff:
Timothy E Rand and Timothy E. Rand
Defendant:
Aschoff Construction, Inc., Jonathan P Stanosheck, Pacific Realty Comme Aschoff Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2018cv00484
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Danny Pierce and Danny E. Pierce
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Pope v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2018cv00421
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
John E Pope and John E. Pope
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Scholl v. NCK Tools, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv03039
Defendant:
NCK Tools, Inc. and Steven E. Robbins
Plaintiff:
Jennifer D. Scholl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Thompson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2018cv00053
Plaintiff:
Noel E. Thompson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Bettisworth v. BNSF Railway Company
as 8:2017cv00491
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Dale E. Bettisworth
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Stewart v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
Garland E. Stewart
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Nelson v. Spohn et al
as 8:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
John W. Nelson
Defendant:
Keith E. Spohn and Spohn Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
