Cases 61 - 70 of 6,598
Villecco v. Spesshardt, et al
as 24-1060
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant:
PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT, JOSEPH M. BARELA, CHER R. HAAVIND and others
Villecco v. Spesshardt, et al
as 24-1059
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant:
PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT, JOSEPH M. BARELA, CHER R. HAAVIND and others
Hill-Thompson et al v. American Economy Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Damian E. Hill-Thompson and Muriel Williams
Defendant:
American Economy Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
KetoNatural Pet Foods, Inc. v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02046
Plaintiff:
KetoNatural Pet Foods, Inc.
Defendant:
Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc., Morris Animal Foundation, Mark Morris Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Watson v. Leclerc et al
as 6:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Watson, I
Defendant:
Jessica Lee Leclerc and United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Watson v. Optum Headquarters et al
as 6:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Watson, I
Defendant:
Optum Headquarters, Heather Ciafrocco, Christ Zaetta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Watson v. Boch et al
as 6:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Watson, I
Defendant:
Gerald W. Boch and United States Department of Veterans Affairs, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant:
Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDonald (D 113183) v. Williams et al
as 5:2024cv03019
Plaintiff:
Sean E. McDonald
Defendant:
Tommy Williams and Gregory Dimarzo
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
