Cases 61 - 70 of 6,113
Worstell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Bron E. Worstell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Edward E. Stevens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Edward E. Stevens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chmiel v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05007
Plaintiff:
Mark E Chmiel
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walter Bradshaw v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-5080
Plaintiff:
WALTER E. BRADSHAW
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cornejo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Mary E Cornejo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carlos E. Paz, Jr. v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Carlos E Paz, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pena v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Rosa E. Pena
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Champion v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Courtney E. Champion
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sharrock v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05003
Plaintiff:
Jaime E. Sharrock
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Terrapin v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Ruth E Terrapin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
