Cases 61 - 70 of 1,574
Terranova et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Raymond Terranova, Eric King, Willie Cole Williams and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Best Coffee in Town et al v. After Midnight Group VII, LLC, The et al
as 0:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Best Coffee in Town, Prescription Songs, Pineapple Lasagne and others
Defendant:
After Midnight Group VII, LLC, The, Brian Asmus, Christopher Diebold and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Payton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Alana Payton, Cole M. Radicic, Matthew Whelihan and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Paul et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
William E. Paul and Kimberly A. Paul
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Lundeen et al v. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 0:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Lundeen and Lori A. Lundeen
Defendant:
Department of Housing and Urban Development, Bank of America, N.A. and Novad Management Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Ti
Kelash v. Mille Lacs County et al
as 0:2022cv03057
Plaintiff:
Raymond-charles Kelash
Defendant:
Mille Lacs County, Tristen DeMotett, Don Lorge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelash v. Mille Lacs County et al
as 0:2022cv03051
Plaintiff:
Sharon-theresa Kelash
Defendant:
Mille Lacs County, Tristen DeMotett, Don Lorge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crutchfield III et al v. Monsanto Company
as 0:2022cv02910
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Crutchfield III and Laurie Crutchfield
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02828
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
