Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Johnson v. Ervin Cable Construction, LLC
as 3:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Ervin Cable Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Moore v. County of Hamilton, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Ervin L Moore and Ervin Lavelle Moore
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Jim Hammond, DOES 1-15, Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Stark v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2019cv02396
Defendant:
MPD Officer Ervin, MPD Sgt. Daniel Cordero, MPD Deputy Chief Don Crowe and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Diane Stark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Ervin v. Brennan
as 2:2018cv02274
Plaintiff:
Kristi Joyce Ervin
Defendant:
Megan J Brennan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe et al v. Washington County Department of Education et al (PLR2)
as 2:2016cv00272
Plaintiff:
John Doe and James Doe
Defendant:
Washington County Department of Education , Washington County Board of Education , James E Murphy, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Anderson v. Washington County Board of Education et al
as 2:2014cv00228
Plaintiff:
Treda Beth Anderson
Defendant:
Washington County Board of Education , William Brinkley , Keith Ervin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ervin v. SouthCentral KY Community College
as 3:2013cv00671
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ervin
Defendant:
SouthCentral KY Community College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
