Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00424
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kynard v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2022cv01405
Petitioner:
James Ervin Kynard
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00717
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Valandingham #033235 v. Akinwale et al
as 2:2020cv01564
Defendant:
Unknown Trujello, Unknown Servious, Daisy Akinwale and others
Plaintiff:
Ervin Ted Valandingham, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kynard #298848 v. Miller et al
as 2:2019cv05157
Plaintiff:
James Ervin Kynard
Defendant:
Mark Brown, Michael Anthony Minicozzi, Pamela D Svoboda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03373
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Watkins and Mark Ervin Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kynard #298848 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv00660
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
James Ervin Kynard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grigsby v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04170
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Ervin J Grigsby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ervin et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03848
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kathy Ervin and William Ervin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lintermoot v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03722
Plaintiff:
Ervin Lintermoot
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
