Cases 1 - 10 of 923
Urmancheev v. Ndoh, et al.
as 24-3043
Plaintiff:
ALIM S. URMANCHEEV
Defendant:
R. NDOH, P. VERA, D GROVES and others
Goode, et al v. Montalbano
as 24-1171
Plaintiff:
JAMES COREY GOODE and GOODE ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Counter Claimant:
ALYSSA CHRYSTIE MONTALBANO
Defendant:
JIRKA RYSAVY, GAIA, INC, WARKINS BRAD and others
Cross Defendant:
LIGHT WARRIOR LEGAL FUND, LLC, DAVID WILCOCK, THE WILCOCK SPIRITUAL HEALING AND EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION and others
Larson v. Groves Capital, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Timothy Larson
Defendant:
Groves Capital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01430
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., GENERAL MOTORS LLC and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC., ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Bells v. NDA, et al.
as 24-1085
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE B. BELLS, JR.
Defendant:
VICTORVILLE USP CORRECTIONS NDA, SHINN, MCCOLLOUGH and others
Nexus Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Long Grove Pharmaceuticals, LLC
as 1:2024cv10444
Plaintiff:
Nexus Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Defendant:
Long Grove Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Johnson et al v. Activision Blizzard Inc et al
as ARE/3:24-CV-00026
Plaintiff:
Johnson, Preston Johnson and Elizabeth Jones
Defendant:
Activision Blizzard Inc, Infinity Ward Inc, Treyarch Corp and others
Baton Rouge Ventures, LLC et al v. Cedar Grove Capital, LLC
as 2:2024mc00024
Plaintiff:
Baton Rouge Ventures, LLC and Charal Baton Rouge Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
Cedar Grove Capital, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
