Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Terrell v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Eli Terrell, Armando Aguilar, Michael Arroyo and others
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gustafson v. Good Sportsman Marketing LLC
as 3:2023cv02337
Plaintiff:
Chad Douglas Gustafson
Defendant:
Good Sportsman Marketing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Konecny v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2022cv00540
Plaintiff:
J. Alan Konecny and J Alan Konecny
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Collin County Texas, Tarrant County Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harward et al v. City Of Austin et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael Gillette, David May, Jo Ann Wiersema and others
Defendant:
Austin Community College and City Of Austin
Petitioner:
Mark Mathias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bertha Alice Gustafson v. Andrew M. Saul
as 5:2020cv00393
Plaintiff:
Bertha Alice Gustafson
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pacheco v. Gustafson et al
as 1:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
Samuel David Pacheco
Defendant:
S. Gustafson, C Brown, FNU Sonier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pacheco v. Gustafson et al
as 1:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Samuel David Pacheco
Defendant:
S. Gustafson, C. Brown, FNU Sonier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tawe v. Roesler
as 4:2017cv03404
Plaintiff:
Richard N. Tawe
Defendant:
Michael A Roesler, Charles H. Landis, Robert J. Jenkins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish v. Davis et al
as 4:2017cv02339
Plaintiff:
Joshua W. Parrish
Defendant:
James E. Berry, Frederick J. McCullough, Jan A. Gustafson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michel v. Chapa et al
as 1:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
Adelson Michel
Defendant:
Rachel Chapa, Radick Davis, Kim Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
