Cases 31 - 40 of 302
EDWARDS v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2020cv10335
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER H. EDWARDS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and PATRICK NOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. PRATT et al
as 3:2020cv10269
Defendant:
SHEREEF M. ELNAHAL, C. WILLAIMS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUTTLE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv02523
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
RONALD H. TUTTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORO v. ASAO et al
as 1:2020cv02282
Defendant:
DR. ROBERT CABANES, L. MOORE, J. RANGONE and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL FRANCIS TORO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCOTT v. SLAUGHTER et al
as 2:2019cv20962
Petitioner:
JAMES H. SCOTT
Respondent:
JAMES SLAUGHTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
INGRAM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv19525
Petitioner:
DAWUD H. INGRAM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RODRIGUEZ v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv19246
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BAR ASSOCIATION, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN EMMANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv17224
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
REGINALD H. WARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ATANGANA v. KHAN et al
as 2:2019cv16980
Defendant:
VALBRUN, MOHAMED KHAN, H. Folajaiye and others
Plaintiff:
LIONEL ROUSSEL ATANGANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WYCKOFF v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2019cv16565
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN
Petitioner:
KASHIFE H. WYCKOFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
