Cases 1 - 10 of 13
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WALLACE v. OBERLANDER et al.
as 3:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT D. OBERLANDER, E. DEPUTY MONGELLOZZO, DEPUTY M. BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TALLEY v. MAZZOCCA et al
as 2:2019cv00161
Defendant:
THOMAS SUCHTA, DUSTIN POPE, DAVID LINK and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Talley v. Wetzel, et al
as 3:2018cv00992
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Tammy Ferguson, Rodney Chism, David Link and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv00868
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Attorney General's Office, Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TALLEY v. WETZEL, et al
as 2:2018cv00476
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
TAMMY FERGUSON, RODNEY CHISM, DAVID LINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Williamson et al
as 3:2015cv01787
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Robert Williamson, Bowman, Pope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2015cv01170
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson, R. Chism and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAGG et al v. MCNEIL-PPC, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01933
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER HAGG and CHAD HAGG
Defendant:
MCNEIL-PPC, INC., MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
