Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Hooks vs Lopez-Rivero, et al
as 2:2024cv00619
Defendant:
Antonay Arnetta Hooks, Lyft, Inc. and Jose Luis Lopez-Rivero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Bowman v. LV Metropolitan Police Dept. et al
as 2:2022cv01481
Plaintiff:
Priscella Saintal Bowman
Defendant:
LV Metropolitan Police Dept., Clark County Detention Center, Bodner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooks v. Lalonde et al
as 2:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Arthur Hooks
Defendant:
Stephanie Lalonde, Michael Allen, Mitchell Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Greer-Wells v. Malone et al
as 2:2020cv00872
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, J. Imperial, S. Hooks and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Greer-Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tough Hook, LLC v. Botach, Inc.
as 2:2018cv01827
Plaintiff:
Tough Hook, LLC
Defendant:
Botach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Goggin v. Enterprise Leasing Company-West, LLC
as 3:2017cv00262
3Rd Party Defendant:
James Sidney Proctor and James Hook
Plaintiff:
Robert M Goggin
Defendant:
Enterprise Leasing Company-West, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Dalton Trucking, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00089
Defendant:
Dalton Trucking, Inc. and Tracey Daniel Hooks
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Hooks v. Williams et al
as 2:2013cv01899
Plaintiff:
Jerome Hooks
Defendant:
Warden Neven, Richardson, Stacey Starks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01892
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hooks v. Neven et al
as 2:2013cv01796
Defendant:
Ted Hanf, Warden Neven, Sanchez and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Hooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
