Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rayvon Boatman v. Wellpath Recovery Solutions, LLC, et al
as 24-10975
Plaintiff:
RAYVON BOATMAN
Defendant:
WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, DONALD SAWYER, EMILY SALEMA and others
Rayvon Boatman v. Wellpath Recovery Solutions, LLC, et al
as 24-10887
Plaintiff:
RAYVON BOATMAN
Defendant:
WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, DONALD SAWYER, EMILY SALEMA and others
Amber Hosack, et al v. Judge Janice Bernal
as 24-10196
Plaintiff:
AMBER HOSACK, on behalf of minors; S, A, J, P and BARBARA HOSACK
Defendant:
JANICE BERNAL
Gregory DavisIn re: Gregory Davis
as 23-12905
Petitioner:
In re: GREGORY M. DAVIS
Respondent:
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 732, JUDGE WOOD, MAGISTRATE JUDGE BENJAMIN W. CHEESBRO and others
Justin Laster v. City of Atlanta, et al
as 22-13639
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN LASTER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ATLANTA, KEISHA LANCE BOTTOMS, FELICIA MOORE and others
Rayvon Boatman v. Donald Sawyer, et al
as 21-12813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYVON BOATMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD SAWYER, EMILY SALEMA, BRIAN LIBEL and others
Sheila Knepfle v. J & P Cycles, LLC, et al
as 21-11996
Defendant / Appellee:
J-TECH CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, J & P CYCLES, LLC, a foreign corporation, HJC CORP. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHEILA KNEPFLE
Dionte Davis v. J. Chitwood, et al
as 20-13185
Defendant / Appellee:
J. CHITWOOD, R. WILLIAMS, J. P. DIMAURO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS
Alba Jimenez-Perez, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 19-12614
Petitioner:
J. J. D. J. P. and ALBA HERLINDA JIMENEZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Eric Johnson v. Commissioner Brian Owens, et al
as 15-14559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC O'BRIEN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER BRIAN OWENS, Georgia Department of Corrections, etc., REGIONAL DIRECTOR CYNTHIA NELSON, Georgia Department of Corrections, WARDEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
