Cases 41 - 50 of 388
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00456
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jackson v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jackson
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Patterson et al
as 2:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Michael Travis Patterson
Defendant:
Robert B Patterson, RJ Reynolds, Texas Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraffa v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Alfred Eric Caraffa
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona, State of, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv02208
Petitioner:
Alawisuces Monta Jackson
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Jimmienez et al
as 4:2021cv00524
Plaintiff:
Marcellus D K Jackson
Defendant:
Adan Jimmienez, Unknwon Dickman, Unknown Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Maricopa County Lower Buckeye Jail
as 2:2021cv02095
Plaintiff:
Bryan Edward Jackson
Defendant:
Maricopa County Lower Buckeye Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Diamondpick Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv02073
Plaintiff:
James Jackson
Defendant:
Diamondpick Incorporated and Mindtree Limited
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jackson v. United States District of Arizona et al
as 4:2021cv00441
Plaintiff:
James Albert Jackson
Defendant:
United States District of Arizona and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson #166465 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01503
Petitioner:
Rex Lee Jackson
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
