Cases 11 - 20 of 567
Daniel Jamison v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6132
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, MARK AMONETTE, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A., RD., State Wide Dietician and others
Jamison v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2024cv00390
Petitioner:
Jean Jamison
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crimmins v. United States et al
as 7:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Crimmins
Defendant:
United States, J.A. Jamison, Carnales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shine v. USA
as 3:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Patrick Jamison Shine
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ray v. Jamison
as 1:2024cv00862
Petitioner:
Joseph Ray
Respondent:
Warden Jamal Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hill v. Government for the State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
Eric Rodney Hill
Defendant:
Government for the State of New York and Warden J. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Walker v. J. Jamison
as 24-5064
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY WALKER
Respondent:
J. L. JAMISON, Warden
HILL v. JAMISON
as 1:2024cv00171
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
J. JAMISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Government for the State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Eric Rodney Hill
Defendant:
Government for the State of New York and Warden J. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harriot v. Jamison
as 1:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Michael Harriot
Respondent:
Warden L. J. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
