Cases 21 - 30 of 213
Jamison v. Robinson et al
as 3:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
David Robinson, Natarcha Gregg, M.S.A, RD and Paul Ohia, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Clarke et al
as 3:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Mark Amonette, Steve Herrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Herrick et al.
as 3:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
Steve Herrick, Leslie Flemming, J.D. Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Haymes et al
as 3:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
Paul Haymes, Mrs. Vanable and R. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Clarke et al
as 3:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, MD Mark Amonette, Steve Herrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Clarke et al
as 3:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Dr. Mark Amonette, J.D. Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Clarke et al
as 3:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Dr. Mark Amonette, Mr. Steve Herrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Clarke et al
as 3:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Dr. Mark Amonette, Steve Herrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
as 5:2023cv01597
Petitioner:
Willie James Jamison
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Jamison Baldwin
as 23-4151
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMISON SYLVESTER BALDWIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
