Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lane-Bey v. Alfred Lane T98017, et al
as 23-1993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED DARNELL LANE-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ALFRED DARNELL LANE T98017, MAURA TRACY HEALEY, Governor, State of Massachusetts, in her individual and official capacity, SHAWN P. JENKINS, Chief of Staff, Massachusetts Department of Correction, in his individual and official capacity and others
Lane-Bey v. Lane T98017 et al
as 1:2023cv12391
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lane-Bey
Defendant:
Alfred Darnell Lane T98017, Maura T. Healy, Shawn P. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenkins v. Devens Federal Medical Center
as 1:2021cv12040
Plaintiff:
Sean Jenkins
Defendant:
Devens Federal Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2020cv00803
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Petitioner:
Daniel Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REICHERT v. ABBOTT et al
as 1:2019cv00240
Defendant:
MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, RANDALL A LIBERTY, HAROLD D ABBOTT, JR and others
Plaintiff:
ROBROY REICHERT
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Spaulding
as 1:2019cv10078
Respondent:
Spaulding
Petitioner:
Sean Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jenkins v. Spaulding
as 1:2018cv12359
Plaintiff:
Sean Jenkins
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Spaulding and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DeAlmeida v. U.S.Goverment, et al
as 1:2017cv11013
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. DeAlmeida
Defendant:
U.S.Goverment, United States Postal Service, Peter Koutoujian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vick v. Officer Sandbag et al
as 1:2016cv11602
Plaintiff:
Ronald Vick
Defendant:
Officer Sandbag and Shawn Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Middlesex County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2015cv11560
Plaintiff:
Dennis Foster
Defendant:
Middlesex County Sheriff's Office, Sean Jenkins and Brian Crane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
