Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Stiff-Brown #587330 v. Shafer et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Duane Stiff-Brown #587330
Defendant:
Unknown Shafer, Unknown Leonhardt, Unknown Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence Jenkins v. Aspirus Eye Clinic, et al
as 24-1012
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE JENKINS
Defendant:
ASPIRUS EYE CLINIC and DOCTOR SHALEN JOHNSON
Jenkins #962092 v. Aspirus Eye Clinic et al
as 2:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jenkins #962092
Defendant:
Aspirus Eye Clinic and Shalen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Chambers Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01793
Plaintiff:
Keith Cooper
Defendant:
Annett Chambers Smith, Governor Mike DeWine, Doctor Eddie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Berrien, County of et al
as 1:2023cv00530
Plaintiff:
Kylen Jenkins
Defendant:
Berrien, County of and Tyler Roots
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #701358 v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Martell Jones #701358
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Kenneth McKee, David Dawdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Passarelli v. Perry et al
as 1:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Passarelli
Defendant:
Unknown Perry, Unknown Jones, Nate Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Vital Care Health Strategies et al
as 1:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
Calvin Anderson
Defendant:
Vital Care Health Strategies, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathaniel Jenkins v. C. Sherry
as 22-1255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL JENKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
C. SHERRY, Physician Assistance and C. SHERRY, Physician's Assistant
Jenkins #512603 v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv01029
Plaintiff:
Marquis D. Jenkins #512603
Defendant:
Dijon Jones, Austin Diekevers, Cole Hoyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
