Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Ronet v. Arizona Department of Public Safety et al
as 2:2021cv01677
Plaintiff:
Jean-Pierre Ronet
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Public Safety, Heston Stibert, Stephen Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry et al
as 2:2021cv00783
Defendant:
Gloria Mattice, Centurion Managed Care, Lance Hetmer and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Lyle Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Penzone
as 2:2019cv02926
Plaintiff:
Vicky Lynn Jenkins
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00084
Plaintiff:
Russell Jenkins
Defendant:
United States of America and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Basta #226043 v. Rode et al
as 2:2018cv04363
Defendant:
Unknown Morris, Unknown Troman, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Sameh Basta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00331
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Bryan N Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. USA
as 2:2018cv00871
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kenneth Lamar Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Linder v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 3:2018cv08030
Plaintiff:
David W Linder
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration, Robert D Cully, Jr., Justin Schoeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mihaylo et al v. Russell-Jenkins et al
as 3:2018cv08004
Respondent:
Shane Russell-Jenkins, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Amy Fackrell and others
Petitioner:
Emily Noelle Mihaylo and James Joseph Knochel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Yavapai County Superior Court
as 3:2018cv08002
Petitioner:
James Edward Jenkins
Respondent:
Yavapai County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
