Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Jenkins v. FCI Beckley
as 4:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Keyshaun Jenkins
Defendant:
FCI Beckley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. USA
as 4:2023cv00983
Petitioner:
Keyshaun Jenkins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Griffin v Missouri Department of Corrections, et al.
as 2:2023cv04090
Plaintiff:
Bryon L Griffin
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Anne L. Precythe, Raina Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. USA
as 2:2021cv04199
Petitioner:
Robert Lawton Jenkins, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Woods v. Fulghum et al
as 6:2020cv03391
Defendant:
Caroline Jenkins, Katherine Barton and Fulghum
Plaintiff:
Darrell Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teter v. Hartness et al
as 2:2019cv04088
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Dave Dormire, B Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Gene Teter, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Access Securepak Company et al
as 2:2019cv04025
Plaintiff:
Van Jenkins
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Access Securepak Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker et al v. Bates County Circuit Court et al
as 4:2018cv00861
Defendant:
Hugh C Jenkins, Kenneth R Rush, Ryan Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
John J Sullivan, Jr and James S Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Burd et al
as 4:2018cv01578
Defendant:
Sanders Mental Health Building, Unknown Jenkins and Bradley Burd
Plaintiff:
John J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kingston DA GOD v. Jefferson City Correctional Center Staff et al
as 2:2017cv04228
Plaintiff:
Universal-Unison A Kingston DA GOD
Defendant:
Jefferson City Correctional Center Staff, R L Baysinger, Stanley Keely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
