Cases 1 - 10 of 531
Lockett et al v. Jenkins Correctional Center
as 6:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Cameron Lockett and Carlos White
Defendant:
Jenkins Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. Jenkins
as 1:2024cv00870
Petitioner:
Luis Alfonso Nunez
Respondent:
Warden S. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Helton v. Jenkins
as 1:2024cv00633
Petitioner:
Norton Helton
Respondent:
Sylester L. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Helton v. Jenkins
as 1:2024cv00604
Petitioner:
Norton Helton
Respondent:
Warden Sylester L. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SLAM Mechanical, LLC v. Royal Flush Plumbing, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
SLAM Mechanical, LLC and Scott Jenkins
Defendant:
Royal Flush Plumbing, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Jeff Konzal, Austin Redman and Logan Webb
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jenkins v. Green et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Rashad Jenkins
Defendant:
Audwon Green, La'quenah Jackson, Michael Paschal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Almanza-Guillen v. Jenkins
as 1:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
Rafael Almanza-Guillen
Respondent:
Warden S. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Warr v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2023cv05802
Plaintiff:
Pamela A Warr
Defendant:
Judy A Jenkins and Family Court, The State of Albany New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nunez v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv05347
Petitioner:
Luis Alfonso Nunez
Respondent:
Warden S. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gomez-Feliz v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv05224
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Gomez-Feliz
Respondent:
Warden Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
