Cases 31 - 40 of 532
Littlejohn v. William et al
as 1:2023cv02953
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Colonel William, Colonel Atkins, CtL. Wessenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mims v. Burnett et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Johnna Jowanna Mims
Defendant:
Amanda Burnett, Tammy Gay, Joanna L. Greenway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Torres v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02885
Petitioner:
Exor Colon Torres
Respondent:
Warden Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pena-Ponce v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02837
Petitioner:
Victor Pena-Ponce
Respondent:
Warden Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rojas-Becerril v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02762
Petitioner:
Jorge Rojas-Becerril
Respondent:
Warden S. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martinez-Palmero v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02763
Petitioner:
Saul Martinez-Palmero
Respondent:
Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vazquez v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02694
Petitioner:
Ignatio Vazquez and Ignacio Vazquez
Respondent:
Warden Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Littlejohn v. Shoultz et al
as 1:2023cv02659
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Deputy Shoultz, Boyette, Craig Oupno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro-Rodriguez v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02691
Petitioner:
Jhon Castro-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden S. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Servantes v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02690
Petitioner:
Yony Ander Bennet Servantes
Respondent:
Warden Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
